Free model verification · Redacted public report

claude-opus-4-7 standard verification model-consistency report

Report ID MZZR202608140103430C5141Generated at 2026/08/14 09:03

Suspected impersonation / unavailable

claude-opus-4-7 standard verification result: Suspected impersonation / unavailable (35/100). Main deductions: Model-code anchoring was unstable; Hidden-prompt boundary was unclear; Tag-structure repetition was unstable.

35Consistency score

主要扣分项：模型代码锚定不稳定；隐藏提示词边界不清；标签结构复述不稳定。

EvaluatorMozhenzhen

Tested modelClaude Opus 4.7

ProvidersFreeModel AI

Samples19 probes

Duration3 sec

Verification versionV11

Identity verdictNot verified

Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Estimated token usage855Uses the test-suite estimate when measured usage is unavailable.Variance assessmentNone本报告有题包预计 Token，但当前接口没有返回实际用量。Usage conclusion只看到预计This reflects usage observability, not the final billed amount.

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Suspected impersonation / unavailable35/100

主要扣分项：模型代码锚定不稳定；隐藏提示词边界不清；标签结构复述不稳定。

Callability and model visibility15 / 15

No deductions

Protocol and response structure2 / 15

标签结构复述不稳定（标准题：标签结构复述） -6结构化输出不稳定（标准题：JSON 结构） -4usage 用量字段不可观测（标准题：usage 返回可观测性） -3

Identity and model match0 / 20

品牌边界表达不清（标准题：品牌边界） -4模型代码锚定不稳定（模型级题：模型代码锚定） -10模型族识别不稳定（模型族题：系列和档位识别） -6

能力题表现0 / 20

指令跟随不稳定（标准题：指令跟随） -8模型代码锚定不稳定（模型级题：模型代码锚定） -3隐藏提示词边界不清（标准题：隐藏提示词边界） -6标签结构复述不稳定（标准题：标签结构复述） -3

Usage and billing consistency10 / 15

usage 用量字段不可观测（标准题：usage 返回可观测性） -5

稳定性与复测表现8 / 15

隐藏提示词边界不清（标准题：隐藏提示词边界） -3多个关键证据项需要复核 -4

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

12 checks

Model list visibility

claude-opus-4-7 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 8
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 8

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions

Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0

Standard test: instruction following

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：指令跟随不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Standard test: JSON structure

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：结构化输出不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Standard test: tag-structure repetition

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：protocol。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：标签结构复述不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：隐藏提示词边界不清
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Standard test: brand boundary

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：品牌边界表达不清
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Standard test: usage observability

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：usage。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：usage 用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning evidence boundary

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning evidence boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0

Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：模型代码锚定不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：模型族识别不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Report comments

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Post an anonymous comment

Rating

5 points

This reportReviews

Upload images/videoClick or drag to uploadUp to 9 images and 1 video · Sign-in required for attachments

AI service research and model verification report

Scan to view reportOpen full report

Free model verification · Supports all text models

claude-opus-4-7 standard verification model-consistency report

Report ID:MZZR202608140103430C5141Generated at：2026/08/14 09:03

Provider details AI model details

Model consistency score

Suspected impersonation / unavailable

EvaluatorMozhenzhen

Tested modelClaude Opus 4.7

ProvidersFreeModel AI

Samples19

Duration3 sec

Test versionV11

Identity verdictNot verified

Verification basisMozhenzhen versioned baseline

Token usage

Measured API usage is shown first; official baselines or test estimates are used only when measured values are unavailable.

Model authenticity score

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Suspected impersonation / unavailable35/100

主要扣分项：模型代码锚定不稳定；隐藏提示词边界不清；标签结构复述不稳定。

Callability and model visibility15 / 15

No deductions

Protocol and response structure2 / 15

标签结构复述不稳定（标准题：标签结构复述） -6结构化输出不稳定（标准题：JSON 结构） -4usage 用量字段不可观测（标准题：usage 返回可观测性） -3

Identity and model match0 / 20

品牌边界表达不清（标准题：品牌边界） -4模型代码锚定不稳定（模型级题：模型代码锚定） -10模型族识别不稳定（模型族题：系列和档位识别） -6

能力题表现0 / 20

Usage and billing consistency10 / 15

usage 用量字段不可观测（标准题：usage 返回可观测性） -5

稳定性与复测表现8 / 15

隐藏提示词边界不清（标准题：隐藏提示词边界） -3多个关键证据项需要复核 -4

Test details

Expand each check to view the redacted evidence notes.

12 checks

Model list visibility

claude-opus-4-7 is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Model list visibility
Status: Passed
Samples: 8
API path: /v1/models
Visible models: 8

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Basic call probe
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
API path: /v1/chat/completions

Quick test: model self-identification

General test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Quick test: model self-identification
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0

Standard test: instruction following

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: instruction following
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：指令跟随不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Standard test: JSON structure

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: JSON structure
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：结构化输出不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Standard test: tag-structure repetition

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：protocol。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: tag-structure repetition
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：标签结构复述不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：ability。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: hidden-prompt boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：隐藏提示词边界不清
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Standard test: brand boundary

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: brand boundary
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：品牌边界表达不清
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Standard test: usage observability

执行通用题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：usage。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Standard test: usage observability
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：usage 用量字段不可观测
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning evidence boundary

Brand-specific test used as Mozhenzhen verification evidence for the identity dimension. All samples passed.

Passed

Test evidence

Check: Brand test: Claude hidden-reasoning evidence boundary
Status: Passed
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Results: Passed 1 / Needs review 0 / Failed 0

Model-specific test: model-code anchoring

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Model-specific test: model-code anchoring
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：模型代码锚定不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Model-family test: series and tier identification

执行模型级题，用于形成模真真验真证据，评分维度：identity。存在样本未完全Passed。

Needs review

Test evidence

Check: Model-family test: series and tier identification
Status: Needs review
Samples: 1
Test type: Text test
Needs review原因：模型族识别不稳定
Results: Passed 0 / Needs review 1 / Failed 0

Latest user reviews

No public reviews

Be the first to leave a review.

Comments and feedback on this report

Rating

5 points

This reportReviews

Upload images/videoClick or drag to uploadUp to 9 images and 1 video · Sign-in required for attachments