Verification report details

Is deepseek-v4-pro genuine? Standard check result

Report ID MZZR202608251645145E8E67Generated at 2026/08/26 00:45

Doubtful

deepseek-v4-pro 本次标准验真结果:Doubtful(67/100)。主要问题:问它是哪个型号时答案会变;不太听指令,让它怎么答它不照做;它不报回用量,没法核对扣费。

67Model consistency score

主要问题:问它是哪个型号时答案会变;不太听指令,让它怎么答它不照做;它不报回用量,没法核对扣费。

Tested byMozhenzhen
Tested modelDeepSeek V4 Pro
Providersnassaapi.xyz
Requests13
Duration1 min 8 sec
Identity verdictNot verified
Reference模真真既有版本化基线

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Reported usage7.9KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage2.5KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation216% aboveThe reported usage is above the estimate; check your bill.Usage checkAbove the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Doubtful67/100

主要问题:问它是哪个型号时答案会变;不太听指令,让它怎么答它不照做;它不报回用量,没法核对扣费。

Can you call it, and is the model listed15 / 15
No deductions
Does the API respond properly12 / 15
它不报回用量,没法核对扣费(用量数据是否完整) -3
Is it the model it claims to be6 / 20
会含糊地把自己说成官方原厂(品牌边界) -4问它是哪个型号时答案会变(模型代码锚定) -10
Does it answer like the official model9 / 20
不太听指令,让它怎么答它不照做(指令跟随) -8问它是哪个型号时答案会变(模型代码锚定) -3
Is usage and billing reasonable10 / 15
它不报回用量,没法核对扣费(用量数据是否完整) -5
Will it keep working15 / 15
No deductions

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.

12 checks
Model list visibility

deepseek-v4-pro is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 2 times; result: Passed.
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Model self-identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 669 tokens
of which 420 tokens were billed at the cache price
指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 有几次没对上。

Needs review
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Instruction following was unstable
This test used 715 tokens
of which 420 tokens were billed at the cache price
JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 482 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用,看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 536 tokens
of which 420 tokens were billed at the cache price
隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 591 tokens
of which 256 tokens were billed at the cache price
品牌边界

问它自己是什么模型,看答案对不对。 有几次没对上。

Needs review
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear
This test used 790 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 有几次没对上。

Needs review
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Usage fields were not observable
This test used 733 tokens
DeepSeek 推理边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 989 tokens
of which 420 tokens were billed at the cache price
模型代码锚定

问它自己是什么模型,看答案对不对。 有几次没对上。

Needs review
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-code anchoring was unstable
This test used 1.0K tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
Model-family test: series and tier identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 885 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

Reviews

还没有人评论,来写第一条。

发表评论

MozhenzhenBefore you buy AI, check Mozhenzhen
Scan to view reportOpen full report
Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls

Is deepseek-v4-pro genuine? Standard check result

Report ID:MZZR202608251645145E8E67Generated at:2026/08/26 00:45
Provider detailsAI model details
Model consistency score

Doubtful

deepseek-v4-pro 本次标准验真结果:Doubtful(67/100)。主要问题:问它是哪个型号时答案会变;不太听指令,让它怎么答它不照做;它不报回用量,没法核对扣费。

Tested byMozhenzhen
Tested modelDeepSeek V4 Pro
Providersnassaapi.xyz
Requests13
Duration1 min
Identity verdictNot verified
Reference模真真既有版本化基线

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Reported usage7.9KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage2.5KEstimated from this test's requests.Deviation216% aboveThe reported usage is above the estimate; check your bill.Usage checkAbove the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

Doubtful67/100

主要问题:问它是哪个型号时答案会变;不太听指令,让它怎么答它不照做;它不报回用量,没法核对扣费。

Can you call it, and is the model listed15 / 15
No deductions
Does the API respond properly12 / 15
它不报回用量,没法核对扣费(用量数据是否完整) -3
Is it the model it claims to be6 / 20
会含糊地把自己说成官方原厂(品牌边界) -4问它是哪个型号时答案会变(模型代码锚定) -10
Does it answer like the official model9 / 20
不太听指令,让它怎么答它不照做(指令跟随) -8问它是哪个型号时答案会变(模型代码锚定) -3
Is usage and billing reasonable10 / 15
它不报回用量,没法核对扣费(用量数据是否完整) -5
Will it keep working15 / 15
No deductions

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed

12 checks
Model list visibility

deepseek-v4-pro is visible in the API model list.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 2 times; result: Passed.
Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.
Model self-identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 669 tokens
of which 420 tokens were billed at the cache price
指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 有几次没对上。

Needs review
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Instruction following was unstable
This test used 715 tokens
of which 420 tokens were billed at the cache price
JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 482 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用,看返回是否规范。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 536 tokens
of which 420 tokens were billed at the cache price
隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 591 tokens
of which 256 tokens were billed at the cache price
品牌边界

问它自己是什么模型,看答案对不对。 有几次没对上。

Needs review
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear
This test used 790 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 有几次没对上。

Needs review
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Usage fields were not observable
This test used 733 tokens
DeepSeek 推理边界

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 989 tokens
of which 420 tokens were billed at the cache price
模型代码锚定

问它自己是什么模型,看答案对不对。 有几次没对上。

Needs review
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-code anchoring was unstable
This test used 1.0K tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price
Model-family test: series and tier identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed
Test details
This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 885 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

Reviews

还没有人评论,来写第一条。

发表评论