Is gemini-2.5-pro genuine? Standard check result

Report ID MZZR2026090117305677ABDAGenerated at 2026/09/02 01:30

High risk

gemini-2.5-pro 本次标准验真结果：High risk（57/100）。主要问题：让它按固定格式输出，它做不稳；问它是哪个型号时答案会变；让它原样复述结构时会出错。

57Model consistency score

主要问题：让它按固定格式输出，它做不稳；问它是哪个型号时答案会变；让它原样复述结构时会出错。

Tested byMozhenzhen

Tested modelGemini 2.5 Pro

Providerstoter.me

Requests17

Duration1 min 25 sec

Identity verdictNot verified

Reference模真真既有版本化基线

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Reported usage2.8KThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage845Estimated from this test's requests.Deviation231% aboveThe reported usage is above the estimate; check your bill.Usage checkAbove the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

High risk57/100

主要问题：让它按固定格式输出，它做不稳；问它是哪个型号时答案会变；让它原样复述结构时会出错。

Can you call it, and is the model listed15 / 15

No deductions

Does the API respond properly5 / 15

让它原样复述结构时会出错（标签结构复述） -6让它按固定格式输出，它做不稳（JSON 结构） -4

Is it the model it claims to be3 / 20

会含糊地把自己说成官方原厂（品牌边界、Gemini 工具和多模态边界） -4它自称的型号前后对不上（模型身份自报） -3问它是哪个型号时答案会变（模型代码锚定） -10

Does it answer like the official model5 / 20

问它是哪个型号时答案会变（模型代码锚定） -3让它原样复述结构时会出错（标签结构复述） -3让它按固定格式输出，它做不稳（JSON 结构） -9

Is usage and billing reasonable15 / 15

No deductions

Will it keep working14 / 15

有几个关键检测项需要复核 -1

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed.

12 checks

Model list visibility

gemini-2.5-pro is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 6 times; result: Passed.

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.

Model self-identification

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Self-reported model identity needs review

指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 435 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Structured output was unstable

标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Tag-structure repetition was unstable

隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 535 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

品牌边界

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear

用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 337 tokens

Gemini 工具和多模态边界

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear

模型代码锚定

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-code anchoring was unstable
This test used 522 tokens

Model-family test: series and tier identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 550 tokens

Reviews

还没有人评论，来写第一条。

发表评论

Before you buy AI, check Mozhenzhen

Scan to view reportOpen full report

Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls

Is gemini-2.5-pro genuine? Standard check result

Report ID:MZZR2026090117305677ABDAGenerated at：2026/09/02 01:30

Provider details AI model details

Model consistency score

High risk

Tested byMozhenzhen

Tested modelGemini 2.5 Pro

Providerstoter.me

Requests17

Duration1 min

Identity verdictNot verified

Reference模真真既有版本化基线

Token usage check

Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.

Results for this test

Review API availability, model identity, response completeness, and other checks separately.

Scoring breakdown

High risk57/100

主要问题：让它按固定格式输出，它做不稳；问它是哪个型号时答案会变；让它原样复述结构时会出错。

Can you call it, and is the model listed15 / 15

No deductions

Does the API respond properly5 / 15

让它原样复述结构时会出错（标签结构复述） -6让它按固定格式输出，它做不稳（JSON 结构） -4

Is it the model it claims to be3 / 20

Does it answer like the official model5 / 20

问它是哪个型号时答案会变（模型代码锚定） -3让它原样复述结构时会出错（标签结构复述） -3让它按固定格式输出，它做不稳（JSON 结构） -9

Is usage and billing reasonable15 / 15

No deductions

Will it keep working14 / 15

有几个关键检测项需要复核 -1

Test details

Expand any row for details; anything private has been removed

12 checks

Model list visibility

gemini-2.5-pro is visible in the API model list.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 6 times; result: Passed.

Basic call probe

The basic API call succeeded and returned a recognizable response.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times; result: Passed.

Model self-identification

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Self-reported model identity needs review

指令跟随

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 435 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

JSON 结构

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Structured output was unstable

标签结构复述

按官方接口的标准调用，看返回是否规范。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Tag-structure repetition was unstable

隐藏提示词边界

用几道题看它的回答水平像不像官方模型。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 535 tokens
of which 128 tokens were billed at the cache price

品牌边界

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear

用量数据是否完整

核对它报回来的用量和缓存计费。 1 次都对。

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 337 tokens

Gemini 工具和多模态边界

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Brand-boundary response was unclear

模型代码锚定

问它自己是什么模型，看答案对不对。有几次没对上。

Needs review

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 need attention.
Why it failed: Model-code anchoring was unstable
This test used 522 tokens

Model-family test: series and tier identification

Asked the model to identify itself; all 1 responses matched the expected name.

Passed

Test details

This test ran 1 times: 1 passed.
This test used 550 tokens

Reviews

还没有人评论，来写第一条。