Highly similarExact model undetermined
Matches all of the official gpt-6-astra, gpt-6.1-sol
These two official models answer almost identically, so we cannot tell which one this is. They are close in ability, but their official prices differ about 5× (gpt-6-astra input/output per million tokens $10 / $50; gpt-6.1-sol $2 / $10). If you are paying the gpt-6-astra price, compare what this provider charges for both.
Brand consistency100/100
Model match score (含同代近似型号 gpt-6.1-sol)100/100
Checks14/17 Passed
- Providers
- 9Router
- Claimed model
- gpt-6-astra
- Plan
- Full check
- Reference
- 103 official models
- Requests
- 17
- Duration
- 2 分钟
01Identity check
Behaviour compared with each official referenceIndependent sample A采样 AValidIndependent sample B采样 BValidIndependent sample C采样 CValidReference103 official models · 3/3 Valid
Answer by answer3 answers: 3 match gpt-6-astra / gpt-6.1-sol
Similarity to official modelsTop 5
- gpt-6-astra · gpt-6.1-solClaimed model and its near-identical sibling — both match closely>99%
- gpt-6-sol<1%
- gpt-6-luna<1%
- gpt-5.6-terra<1%
02Test details
17 items · 14 passed · 3 notes · 0 failed| No. | Check | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity & auth | |||
| A-01 | Endpoint reachable | Passed | The endpoint responds normally |
| A-02 | Key authentication | Passed | API key is valid and allowed to make calls |
| A-03 | Model on sale | Passed | The model list includes cx/gpt-6-astra |
| API conformance | |||
| B-01 | Basic call | Passed | Returns the expected content as instructed |
| B-02 | Response structure | Meets the spec | All OpenAI-compatible fields are present |
| B-03 | Model ID echoed back | Match | The model ID in the response matches the request |
| B-04 | Usage record | Complete and consistent | Input, output and total are all present, and the total equals the sum |
| B-05 | Output cleanliness | Nothing added | No inserted ads, watermarks or extra notes found |
| Identity check | |||
| C-01 | Independent sampling | 3 / 3 valid | All independent samples can be used for comparison |
| C-02 | Brand consistency | Match | Behavior belongs to the OpenAI GPT family; brand match score 100 |
| C-03 | Model consistency | Exact model undetermined | Matches all of the official gpt-6-astra, gpt-6.1-sol; these models answer almost identically |
| C-04 | Cross-brand swap check | None found | Similarity to other brands' models totals under 1% |
| Billing & capabilities | |||
| D-01 | Cache billing | Does not work | The vendor offers a cache price for this model, but none of the repeated requests were billed at it. |
| D-02 | Context length | 1M passed | 32K / 128K / 400K / 1M: every tier was read in full. |
| D-03 | Streaming output | Normal | Streamed content is complete |
| D-04 | Tool use | Supported | Returns the correct function name and arguments |
| D-05 | Structured output | Did not follow the schema | The response did not follow the required JSON schema |
Cache billing check
The same long content was sent 5 times: the 1st is billed at the regular price, and from the 2nd on the repeated part should be billed at the cache price.
Cache billing ratio0.0%
Does not work
The vendor offers a cache price for this model, but none of the repeated requests were billed at it.
Usage this run46.7KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens46.7KAverage per run9.3K
Usage reportedReportedCache billingDid not happenResultDoes not work
Cache share by testThis is only the cache share the endpoint reported; the real discount is on the bill
Context length check
Long documents are sent tier by tier to check whether the whole document is read.
Verified up to 1M
32K / 128K / 400K / 1M: every tier was read in full.
Reference windowVerified up to 1MThe model center has no reference context window for this model yet.Tested context lengths32K / 128K / 400K / 1MTested from short to long, stopping at the first failure.
- 32KRead in full · 37.0K received
- 128KRead in full · 115.3K received
- 400KRead in full · 371.3K received
- 1MRead in full · 920.2K received
Token usage check
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Reported usage1.5MThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage1.3M-1.8MEstimated from this test's requests.DeviationWithin the estimateThe reported usage is within the estimated range.Usage checkMatches the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.
Method: independent samples from the tested endpoint are compared against reference samples collected from official channels; billing, context and capability items come from real calls. API keys, request bodies and raw model output are not stored.
This report reflects the endpoint at the time of testing.
Post an anonymous comment
Before you buy AI, check MozhenzhenScan to view reportOpen full report
Mozhenzhen verification report · Measured with real calls
cx/gpt-6-astra verification report
Highly similarExact model undetermined
Matches all of the official gpt-6-astra, gpt-6.1-sol
These two official models answer almost identically, so we cannot tell which one this is. They are close in ability, but their official prices differ about 5× (gpt-6-astra input/output per million tokens $10 / $50; gpt-6.1-sol $2 / $10). If you are paying the gpt-6-astra price, compare what this provider charges for both.
Brand consistency100/100
Model match score (含同代近似型号 gpt-6.1-sol)100/100
Checks14/17 Passed
- Providers
- 9Router
- Claimed model
- gpt-6-astra
- Plan
- Full check
- Reference
- 103 official models
- Requests
- 17
- Duration
- 2 分钟
01Identity check
Behaviour compared with each official referenceIndependent sample A采样 AValidIndependent sample B采样 BValidIndependent sample C采样 CValidReference103 official models · 3/3 Valid
Answer by answer3 answers: 3 match gpt-6-astra / gpt-6.1-sol
Similarity to official modelsTop 5
- gpt-6-astra · gpt-6.1-solClaimed model and its near-identical sibling — both match closely>99%
- gpt-6-sol<1%
- gpt-6-luna<1%
- gpt-5.6-terra<1%
02Test details
17 items · 14 passed · 3 notes · 0 failed| No. | Check | Result | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity & auth | |||
| A-01 | Endpoint reachable | Passed | The endpoint responds normally |
| A-02 | Key authentication | Passed | API key is valid and allowed to make calls |
| A-03 | Model on sale | Passed | The model list includes cx/gpt-6-astra |
| API conformance | |||
| B-01 | Basic call | Passed | Returns the expected content as instructed |
| B-02 | Response structure | Meets the spec | All OpenAI-compatible fields are present |
| B-03 | Model ID echoed back | Match | The model ID in the response matches the request |
| B-04 | Usage record | Complete and consistent | Input, output and total are all present, and the total equals the sum |
| B-05 | Output cleanliness | Nothing added | No inserted ads, watermarks or extra notes found |
| Identity check | |||
| C-01 | Independent sampling | 3 / 3 valid | All independent samples can be used for comparison |
| C-02 | Brand consistency | Match | Behavior belongs to the OpenAI GPT family; brand match score 100 |
| C-03 | Model consistency | Exact model undetermined | Matches all of the official gpt-6-astra, gpt-6.1-sol; these models answer almost identically |
| C-04 | Cross-brand swap check | None found | Similarity to other brands' models totals under 1% |
| Billing & capabilities | |||
| D-01 | Cache billing | Does not work | The vendor offers a cache price for this model, but none of the repeated requests were billed at it. |
| D-02 | Context length | 1M passed | 32K / 128K / 400K / 1M: every tier was read in full. |
| D-03 | Streaming output | Normal | Streamed content is complete |
| D-04 | Tool use | Supported | Returns the correct function name and arguments |
| D-05 | Structured output | Did not follow the schema | The response did not follow the required JSON schema |
Cache billing check
The same long content was sent 5 times: the 1st is billed at the regular price, and from the 2nd on the repeated part should be billed at the cache price.
Cache billing ratio0.0%
Does not work
The vendor offers a cache price for this model, but none of the repeated requests were billed at it.
Usage this run46.7KCached tokens0Non-cached tokens46.7KAverage per run9.3K
Usage reportedReportedCache billingDid not happenResultDoes not work
Cache share by testThis is only the cache share the endpoint reported; the real discount is on the bill
Context length check
Long documents are sent tier by tier to check whether the whole document is read.
Verified up to 1M
32K / 128K / 400K / 1M: every tier was read in full.
Reference windowVerified up to 1MThe model center has no reference context window for this model yet.Tested context lengths32K / 128K / 400K / 1MTested from short to long, stopping at the first failure.
- 32KRead in full · 37.0K received
- 128KRead in full · 115.3K received
- 400KRead in full · 371.3K received
- 1MRead in full · 920.2K received
Token usage check
Reported usage is used; estimates appear only when none is reported.
Reported usage1.5MThe actual usage reported by the API; this page goes by it.Estimated usage1.3M-1.8MEstimated from this test's requests.DeviationWithin the estimateThe reported usage is within the estimated range.Usage checkMatches the estimateFigures are as reported by the API; your bill is authoritative.
Method: independent samples from the tested endpoint are compared against reference samples collected from official channels; billing, context and capability items come from real calls. API keys, request bodies and raw model output are not stored.
This report reflects the endpoint at the time of testing.